One of the frequent questions coming to Gard Defence Lawyers is whether the COVID-19 pandemic falls within the various charterparty force majeure clauses. We are grateful to Brian Perrott, partner with HFW, and his colleagues for sharing their views.
Force majeure, taken from the French for 'superior force', is a common clause in contracts that can limit a party's liability when an extraordinary event or circumstance outside the party's control prevents or hinders that party from fulfilling its obligations under the contract. Generally, the clause allows, on the occurrence of certain events, for one (or both) of the parties to cancel the contract and/or be excused from performance of some or all of its obligations for a period of time. Factual scenarios and charter terms vary and need to be considered individually so the following views should not be considered as legal advice.
ii. Prevented, delayed or hindered performance (depending on clause wording); and that
iii. Party seeking to rely on clause has taken all reasonable steps to mitigate.
Is COVID-19 an FM event?
i. Act of God: this has been described in caselaw as a "direct and violent and sudden and irresistible act of Nature". It is unclear whether COVID-19 would fall within this category, but it is arguable.
ii. Act of government
iii. Other circumstances beyond reasonable control.
The precise wording and circumstances must be assessed. Further, for contracts entered after the outbreak in China, it may be more difficult to argue that, as a matter of construction, COVID-19 should fall within more general wording (as it could have been specifically listed).
3. Does the clause require events to be unforeseeable?
i. It seems likely that COVID-19 was an unforeseeable event. However, for contracts entered into after the outbreak, a requirement in an FM clause for events to be unforeseeable may prevent reliance on the clause.
Insufficiency of goods
A party may still be able to rely on FM if it can perform some contracts but not all. But, they must generally allocate goods reasonably, e.g. pro rata.
FM must be the effective cause – if there are other causes which are not FM events and which would have affected performance, then a party may not be able to rely on FM.
A party must generally show that it could not have avoided the impact by taking reasonable steps. Financial cost may be a factor as to what steps are reasonable.
In light of the extreme circumstances, the courts may adopt a generous approach to mitigation. For contracts entered into after the outbreak, parties may be held to a higher standard of mitigation.
Should be complied with. Compliance may be a requirement to rely on the clause.
May apply even if there is no FM clause. However, this is difficult to satisfy. Careful consideration of the contractual obligations would be required to assess whether it applies.
Please note that the above is intended as guidance only and relates to English law. It should not be considered as legal advice.